Airbus has recently launched its ‘Smarter Skies’ vision of how aviation will look in 2050. There are some good ideas but the overall package is looking more disingenuous than smart.
Aviation is fighting hard to protect the status quo against the demands of environmentalists. In Europe, Airbus describes the situation on its website under the heading ‘The Environment and Air travel’:
‘Air travel is an invaluable global asset which is at the heart of today’s global economy. Therefore, safeguarding aviation’s economic & societal benefits is crucial. More than 56 million jobs and USD $2.2 trillion of global gross domestic product are supported by the air travel industry. The aviation industry’s global economic impact is 3.5 per cent of global GDP. If aviation were a country, it would rank 19th in size by GDP – approximately the size as Switzerland or Poland. Globally the aviation sector is expanding. Passenger demand doubles every 15 years and by 2050 it could be handling 16 billion passengers and 400 million tonnes of cargo annually. In the meantime, passengers have become increasingly mindful of the ecological impact of their travel choices.’
Four sentences before any mention of the environment, in a section specifically about the environment, is a peculiar way to present their case.
On the other side of the Atlantic, Boeing’s environmental report 2012 is more upbeat:
‘At Boeing, we are focused on creating cleaner, more efficient flight. Each new generation of products we bring to the marketplace is quieter, consumes less fuel and is better for the environment.’
This claim is referenced to the dawn of the jet age when we discovered how to pump fuel out the back and ignite it to produce thrust. Boeing omits to mention that only their newest planes match the fuel efficiency of the propeller driven airliners of the 1950s.
Policy makers should look outside the aviation industry, for advice and the policy choices available, as the industry is hell bent on defending an antiquated vision of aviation which has no place in the 21st century.
Disingenuous Skies - Sustainability in the aviation industry
Authored by:
Peter McManners
Peter McManners is a thought leader on sustainability, works as an author, consultant, documentary film maker and teaches as a Visiting Executive Fellow of Henley Business School. He also writes a monthly column in Sustainable Business magazine. His multidiscipline background as an engineer, geographer and management expert has shaped his view of a sustainable future society. ...Other Posts by Peter McManners
» Already a member? Login now to comment!
» Not a member? Register to comment!
Don Piper says:
Thanks Peter - I'm with you 100%; Disingenuous Skies indeed!
Your photo clearly captures the distinction between contrails and chemtrails [what you posted are chemtrails not contrails]. I was surprised that you made no mention of this in your post [albeit off topic]. Seems to me that intentioanlly seeding the skies with aluminum, barium and strontium at toxic levels is an even bigger issue than aviation industry greenwashing.
Sustainable Business Forum
Ted Coine Ted Coiné is one of the most influential business leaders on Twitter and author of the book Catalyst. More »
Richard Crespin Richard Crespin is an entrepreneur and CSR adviser to executives. More »
Marc Gunther Marc Gunther is a contributing editor at FORTUNE magazine who writes and speaks about business and sustainability. More »
Kimberly Knickle Kim Knickle is a frequent conference speaker, and is responsible for research and analysis of business and IT issues. More »
Dave Meyer Dave Meyer is the founder and principal of ValueStream Performance Advisors. More »
Derek Wong Derek Wong is a Toronto based sustainability consultant. More »

About Social Media Today


 vF.gif)